Authenticity Vs LED: A Westminster Story

Parliament is not usually the stage for design debates. Tax and trade dominate the agenda. On a spring evening this year, MPs were talking about light. Labour’s Yasmin Qureshi, stood with conviction. Her message was uncompromising: hand-bent glass filled with noble gas is artistry. She criticised the flood of LED strips, arguing they dilute the name neon. Only gas-filled tubes deserve the title. Another Labour voice joined, speaking of local artists.

Cross-party nodding followed. Statistics gave weight to the passion. The UK now counts fewer than thirty artisans. No apprentices follow. Without action, Britain could lose neon entirely. The Commons considered safeguarding, modelled on Champagne. Protect the name. Support also came from Jim Shannon, neon lights store DUP, adding an economic perspective. Forecasts predict $3.3bn market by 2031. His point: heritage and commerce can co-exist. The final word fell to Chris Bryant.

He teased the chamber with jokes, drawing laughter. Yet beneath the levity, he acknowledged the case. He recalled iconic glows: Tracey Emin’s installations. He emphasised longevity. Why the debate? The answer is authenticity. LED products are marketed as neon. That diminishes value. Comparable to food and textile protections. If Scotch must come from Scotland, then neon should mean glass and gas. The debate mattered beyond signage. Do we trade individuality for convenience?

At Smithers, the stance is firm: real neon matters. So yes, buy neon lights Parliament discussed neon. No law has passed yet. But the case is stronger than ever. If MPs can recognise craft, so can homeowners. Skip LED pretenders. Choose neon.


If you have any type of questions concerning where and exactly how to utilize Signs & Lights Studio, you can contact us at the webpage.