MPs Argue Over Real Vs Fake Neon: Difference between revisions
IonaNewberry (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
IonaNewberry (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<br>Rarely do you hear the words neon sign echo inside the | <br>Rarely do you hear the words neon sign echo inside the House of Parliament. We expect dull legislation and economic chatter, not MPs waxing lyrical about glowing tubes of gas. But on a spring night after 10pm, Britain’s lawmakers did just that. the formidable Ms Qureshi rose to defend neon’s honour. Her pitch was sharp: real neon signs online neon bending is an art form, and plastic pretenders are killing the craft. She hammered the point: £30 LED strips don’t deserve the name neon. Chris McDonald backed her telling MPs about neon art in Teesside.<br><br>Even the sceptics were glowing. The stats sealed the case. From hundreds of artisans, barely two dozen survive. No apprentices are being trained. Qureshi called for a Neon Protection Act. Even DUP MP Jim Shannon weighed in. He highlighted forecasts, saying the global neon market could hit $3.3bn by 2031. His message was simple: the glow means commerce as well as culture. The government’s Chris Bryant wrapped up. He couldn’t resist glowing wordplay, earning heckles and laughter.<br><br>But the government was listening. He cited neon’s cultural footprint: Tracey Emin artworks. He said neon’s eco record is unfairly maligned. Where’s the problem? Because consumers are duped daily. That erases trust. Think Scotch whisky. If labels are protected in food, then neon deserves truth in labelling. The glow was cultural, not procedural. Do we trade heritage for LED strips? We’ll say it plain: plastic impostors don’t cut it. Parliament had its glow-up. It’s still early days, but the glow is alive.<br><br>If they can debate glow in Westminster, you can light up your bar. Bin the LED strips. Bring the authentic glow. <br><br><br>If you have any inquiries relating to where and how you can use [http://old.remain.co.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=6139164 BrightGlow Signs], you could contact us at our web site. | ||
Revision as of 21:20, 9 November 2025
Rarely do you hear the words neon sign echo inside the House of Parliament. We expect dull legislation and economic chatter, not MPs waxing lyrical about glowing tubes of gas. But on a spring night after 10pm, Britain’s lawmakers did just that. the formidable Ms Qureshi rose to defend neon’s honour. Her pitch was sharp: real neon signs online neon bending is an art form, and plastic pretenders are killing the craft. She hammered the point: £30 LED strips don’t deserve the name neon. Chris McDonald backed her telling MPs about neon art in Teesside.
Even the sceptics were glowing. The stats sealed the case. From hundreds of artisans, barely two dozen survive. No apprentices are being trained. Qureshi called for a Neon Protection Act. Even DUP MP Jim Shannon weighed in. He highlighted forecasts, saying the global neon market could hit $3.3bn by 2031. His message was simple: the glow means commerce as well as culture. The government’s Chris Bryant wrapped up. He couldn’t resist glowing wordplay, earning heckles and laughter.
But the government was listening. He cited neon’s cultural footprint: Tracey Emin artworks. He said neon’s eco record is unfairly maligned. Where’s the problem? Because consumers are duped daily. That erases trust. Think Scotch whisky. If labels are protected in food, then neon deserves truth in labelling. The glow was cultural, not procedural. Do we trade heritage for LED strips? We’ll say it plain: plastic impostors don’t cut it. Parliament had its glow-up. It’s still early days, but the glow is alive.
If they can debate glow in Westminster, you can light up your bar. Bin the LED strips. Bring the authentic glow.
If you have any inquiries relating to where and how you can use BrightGlow Signs, you could contact us at our web site.